top of page
Home: About Us

The first step is to remind our students and colleagues that those who hold views contrary to one’s own are rarely evil or stupid, and may know or understand things that we do not. It is only when we start with this assumption that rational discourse can begin, and that the winds of freedom can blow." Former Stanford Provost John Etchemendy

FEATURED ITEMS

​

 

Restoring the Academic Social Contract

-- Stanford alum and U Texas-Austin Provost William Inboden

​

Report of the Yale Committee on Trust in Higher Education

​

Guiding Principles -- Stanford President Jon Levin and Provost Jenny Martinez

 

​

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

From Our Latest Newsletter​

​

"To Be True To The Best You Know" -- Jane Stanford

 

 

 

​May 18, 2026

 

The Bureaucratization of Student Life at Stanford

 

We have added to the top of our Stanford Concerns webpage PDF copies of Stanford’s current policies and procedures for:

 

  1. Determining where an undergraduate will live next year (the Draw); and

     

  2. Holding a party.

 

To quote an alum who recently read these two documents: 

 

“I am floored. Stunned. Overwhelmed. I had never before read the policy manual for planning a party. If it had not come from a confirmed source, I would have easily concluded it was a parody. It is simply unreal. I have never before seen anything quite like it. What a travesty of bureaucrats squeezing the life out of everyday events.  

 

“Equally terrifying are the rules governing the Draw. I have long believed that the (lottery-like) Draw, combined with the chronic multi-decades long shortage of undergrad housing, are responsible for radically harming the campus student experience at Stanford and, as a long-term consequence, undermining long-term alumni ties to Stanford and thereby reducing alumni donation rates. Stanford’s undergrad housing and its Draw system are an embarrassment in comparison to the campus experiences provided by so-called peer schools.”

 

We encourage readers to read these two documents for themselves, although with this warning: Even the lawyers among you may find it difficult to make their way through just one of the documents, let alone both. Yet this is what Stanford subjects its undergraduates to, and this is only a sample of current policies and procedures that now dominate campus life. 

 

Instead of having hundreds of mid-level staff people meeting, writing, revising, meeting again, revising again and then expanding still further these sorts of byzantine policies and procedures, shouldn’t Stanford’s senior administrators, faculty, students and trustees be asking: How do we create a system where little if any of this is needed in the first place? Frankly, we think that is quite do-able.

​

**********

​

See also The Office - Best Clips of the Party Planning Committee at YouTube (video, 10 minutes).

 

**********

​

Editor’s note: This article and the two PDF documents now posted at the top of our Stanford Concerns webpage were prepared several days before a similar discussion appeared in an article at The Times of London regarding Stanford undergraduate Theo Baker, including references to his book, to be released tomorrow (May 19), “How to Rule the World: An Education in Power at Stanford University,” and with this excerpt from the Times article:

 

“[Baker went to the Daily’s offices,] offering to write about Stanford’s shrinking party scene, caused by what students had named the ‘war on fun’. The college had banned parties in dormitories, prohibited alcohol and created something called the Party Review Committee.

 

“‘On the surface it’s this sort of absurd and ridiculous and honestly funny thing, right?’ he says. ‘Because you have this bureaucratic contortionism, you know, where kids have to take a course and pass an exam to be able to apply three weeks in advance to host a college function of any kind.’ They had to apply to the Party Review Committee, ‘which only meets once a week on Tuesdays’.

 

“The college seemed to be reacting to all the well-publicised incidents of hazing, of student deaths, of campus sexual assault.

 

“‘They arguably make things less safe,’ Baker says. Because the practical result was huge crowds of students all trying to squeeze into one approved party or going off campus to the least salubrious parts of San Francisco to do their drinking."​​

​

Why We Care -- Stanford's Leadership in Teaching, Research and Innovation 

 

Guiding Principles of Stanford President Jon Levin and Provost Jenny Martinez; full statement at Stanford Report.

 

Stanford's Continued High Standing in Various Disciplines; full article, as noted previously, at U.S. News including charts showing that Stanford ranked #1 in business, law, computer science, economics and psychology, #2 in engineering, #3 in biology and earth sciences and #4 in chemistry (some were ties and Stanford's School of Medicine in recent years has declined to participate).

 

Stanford Is Considered the Most Beautiful College Campus in the U.S.; full article at Travel & Leisure. 

 

Examples of Current Research (click on each article for direct access; selections are from Stanford Report and other Stanford websites):

 

​​

Other Articles of Interest

 

Higher Education Still Valued but Considered Out of Reach

Full article at Gallup: “Only one in four adults without a college degree (25%) believe most people can access a quality, affordable education. This is the lowest level recorded since 2022 and a drop of 10 points in just two years. Even so, nearly three in four adults without a degree (73%) say earning a credential is just as important today as it was 20 years ago.”

 

Download a PDF copy of the full report from Lumina Foundation here and alumni report here.

 

See also “U.S. Leads the World in Youth Pessimism About Job Prospects” at Gallup: “In no other country does young adults' confidence in the jobs market lag behind older adults' by such a wide margin.”

 

Lawmakers See Different Threats to Campus Speech but the Same Stakes

Full article at FIRE.

​

The Only Thing Harder Than Getting Into College Is Getting Off the Wait List

Full article at WSJ: “The University of California, Berkeley had almost 6,500 students on its wait list last year. It ended up admitting none of them.”

 

In AI Adoption, Don't Forget the Human Touch

Full op-ed at Hechinger Report.

​

There Is a Fire Sale on MBAs

Full article at WSJ.

 

See also “Here’s What to Know About Post-Grad Unemployment” at U.S. News.

 

Sex Week at Stanford

Full article at Stanford Review.​

 

**********

“By allowing civic education to erode, by abandoning a commitment to pluralism that includes viewpoint diversity, and by failing to achieve approaches to admissions and credentialing that are broadly experienced as fair, universities have failed to contribute as they might to the health of American democracy.” — Harvard Prof. Danielle Allen​​​​​

Comments and Questions from Our Readers

See more reader comments on our Reader Comments webpage.

Need Dialog, Not Prohibitions

​

I suggest the university produce forums in which ultimate concerns about war and peace presently unfolding be formally debated, subject to the rules of decorum. This is what the university is for, not prohibitions on argument or advocacy. Silence renders learning impossible. 

Hoping for Balanced Speech at Stanford

​

I am so in support of the opinions expressed here and hope Stanford will adopt a more balanced approach to free speech. I can only hope.

 

Teaching Young People and Others How to Disagree Civilly

​

While I believe that supporting free speech is very important in and of itself, I also believe that there is a related component that is often ignored. That component is teaching people, especially young people, how to disagree civilly/how to constructively respond to free speech they might not agree with.

Question About Ties to the Alumni Association

​

Q.  I notice that the SAA website contains no links to the Stanford Alumni for Free Speech and Critical Thinking website. Why is that?

 

A. Our website is not linked at the SAA website since we intentionally did not seek to become an affiliate of SAA. Among other things, we wanted to maintain independence, including since SAA became a subsidiary of 

the university in the mid-1990’s. That said, there are a number of current and former Stanford administrators and trustees who receive our Newsletters and read the materials that are posted at the website.

About Us

Member, Alumni Free Speech Alliance

 

Stanford Alumni for Free Speech and Critical Thinking is an independent, diverse, and nonpartisan group of Stanford alumni committed to promoting and safeguarding freedom of thought and expression, intellectual diversity and inclusion, and academic freedom at Stanford.

​

We believe innovation and positive change for the common good is achieved through free and active discourse from varying viewpoints, the freedom to question both popular and unpopular opinions, and the freedom to seek truth without fear of reprisal from those who disagree, within the confines of humanity and mutual respect.  

 

Our goal is to support students, faculty, administrators, and staff in efforts that assure the Stanford community is truly inclusive as to what can be said in and outside the classroom, the kinds of speakers that can be invited, and what should always be the core principles of a great university like Stanford.  We also advocate that Stanford incorporates the Chicago Trifecta, the gold standard for freedom of speech and expression at college and university campuses, and that Stanford abides by these principles in both its policies and its actions.  

​

bottom of page